Home   Forum   Wiki   Notes   Register   FAQ   Sitemap   About Us   Contact Us  

Movies Held With ARR As MD

Topic started by Periodic (@ 207.44.152.100) on Tue Apr 1 07:02:49 EST 2003.
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Have attached the link here.

http://www.thatstamil.com/specials/cinema/shooting-spot/parthiban.html

http://movies.sify.com/cgi-bin/sifymovies/movies/content/movies_fullstory.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0522428284.1049237196@@@@&BV_EngineID=cadcgldmmhefbemgcfkmcgedng.0&content_oid=12964841&category_oid=-21346

If the second link doesn't work pls try movies.sify.com and go to Tamil section and look for 'Boys Don't Grow' or 'Setback For Shankar'.
Has the quality and speed of ARR and finally exposing on the real potential of ARR.

Please dicscuss here.

---

Responses:

• From: Vaathiyaar (@ 203.106.140.186) on: Tue Apr 1 10:13:46 EST 2003
  
  Looks like the IR squad is more anxious and awaiting ARR's releases, than his fans. :)
  What a waiting, what a waiting.
  
  
• From: C~P (@ 202.9.181.237) on: Tue Apr 1 11:11:27 EST 2003
  
  nuthin to do with ARR FYI...
  
  "Already Shankar and his cameraman Ravi.K.Chandran (see pic) have consumed 1,80,000 feet of raw film, rewritten the script three times and even changed the artists a few times"
  story not clear and u need songs?!
  
  
  "And adding to the confusion the tunes that Shankar agrees are pinched by Jyothi for his film."
  how is ARR to be blamed?!
  ***************
  
  Discussion Ends Here! :)
  
  
• From: mythila (@ 137.237.13.20) on: Tue Apr 1 11:11:55 EST 2003
  
  Thta should be the producer's botheration and not ours.
  
  
• From: tranknu (@ 64.246.46.52) on: Tue Apr 1 11:45:16 EST 2003
  
  C~P,
  
  I guess you missed the most important quote,
  
  "Added to that A.R.Rahman is yet to deliver two of the six songs in the film."
  
  
  You also have not mentioned anything abt the whole link on thatstamil.com.
  
  Just for your info if had missed.
  
  
• From: STONE COLD (@ 210.186.78.22) on: Tue Apr 1 21:17:56 EST 2003
  
  but i thought boys had 16 songs?
  
  
• From: siva (@ 203.121.0.15) on: Tue Apr 1 22:04:12 EST 2003
  
  C~P
  
  "And adding to the confusion the tunes that Shankar agrees are pinched by Jyothi for his film."
  how is ARR to be blamed?! "
  
  how can Jyothi pinch without ARR giving?
  i presume he gave it to the highest bidder...
  
  
  
  
• From: RRA - ( reverse rahman analog ) (@ 65.176.168.195) on: Tue Apr 1 22:58:56 EST 2003
  
  Usually girls have sweet 16. (also, pls refer the song - you are sixteen goin on seventeen....)
  
  
• From: Peter Pan (@ 194.170.246.113) on: Wed Apr 2 00:35:35 EST 2003
  
  Whether the movie gets released or not, I am content with listening to the melodious title song from Udhaya, 'udhaya Udhaya'.
  
  It may easily join the ranks of his extremely melodious "MalargaLe malargaLe" (but the movie 'Love Birds' didn't deserve it). Though IMO, Sadhana is just about okay in the Udhaya song. Chitra would have done wonders to the number just like she did with the former. Chitra, where art thou?
  
  
• From: dinesh (@ 210.186.42.30) on: Wed Apr 2 06:32:47 EST 2003
  
  ohh plzzz chitra will spoil that beautiful song with her squicking voices..ekkkk eww...only sadhana can sing that kinda love romantic song...well done sadhana....
  
  
• From: dinesh (@ 210.186.42.30) on: Wed Apr 2 06:36:38 EST 2003
  
  hey did i mention that that news by sify was false??do u know rahman actually finished the 16 songs few months back...??~even shankar said it in his interview and the audio will be released this month on taml new year(if im not mistaken)this sify.com pep is really an anti-arr gang...so dun belive any of thier news on ARR...and even shankar fnished the movie few weeks ago..so plzz...dun blame rahman for news such as this..plz....
  OM NAMA SHIVAYA!!
  
  
• From: Kaumudi (@ 136.142.153.250) on: Wed Apr 2 11:10:25 EST 2003
  
  Peter Pan
  I second your opinion. I really miss her singing some challenging numbers like the Udhaya song. Enna solli paduvatho would have a lot better with chithra singing it. Hmm...I hope there is lot more coming up from KSC in the future.
  
  
• From: C~P (@ 202.9.148.180) on: Wed Apr 2 11:48:05 EST 2003
  
  traknu,
  i din forget that....
  i said . . "story not clear and u need songs?!"
  neways i still ahve to go thro the thing abt elelo......yaezhuthu kooti padikka somberi thanam! :)
  
  siva,
  pls not that both are being produced by A.M.Ratnam......AMR wud have insisted that the song be given to Jyothi coz Jyothi is his son......dats wat the article sez.....end with "blood is thicker than water"
  
  
  
  
• From: siva (@ 203.121.0.15) on: Wed Apr 2 23:54:37 EST 2003
  
  C~P,
  
  i understand both films are by a.m.ratnam ...
  but the matter of simple ethics should be practise... arr could have just said "no" and sticked to his principles....
  
  i remember reading some years back that when shankar heard the song "veerapandi kotayile" at rahman's studio, he wanted it..... but rahman told him, that song was already booked by maniratnam...
  
  why not practise the same principle here?
  
  
• From: Peter Pan (@ 194.170.246.113) on: Thu Apr 3 06:02:43 EST 2003
  
  Kaumudi,
  
  I heard that Chitra was recently blessed with a baby (after many many years of 'tavam'). With this new addition to her life, let's hope she's soon back with a bang in TFM. The Shreyas and Chinmayees can now call her "Chitramma" like Chitra affectionately calls Janakiyamma & Susheelamma :)
  
  She also seems to be concentrating on devotional albums for her hubby's recording label of late. Hope she does balance this act with singing for films as well (and not follow the path of Anuradha Poudwal, who, from one of the busiest singers in HFM has now completely disappeared from this genre and is doing only some devotional albums for her 'AsthAna' T-Series label)
  
  I am now listening to a rare Chitra gem, "MathAppoovu oru peNNAgAthA", from the movie "Michael Madana KAmarajan". Her melliflous rendition in this IR number is remarkable. Comeback Chitra! More than ever, TFM needs you now!
  
  
• From: C~P (@ 202.9.180.211) on: Thu Apr 3 11:01:49 EST 2003
  
  siva,
  ethics? .... mm .... the last time ARR sed know cud have been coz the song was booked my MANIRATNAM (remember thiruda thiruda was actually wat ARR was first booked for) .... shankar at that time was doing his first film and tis very easy for ARR to say no
  also.....a producer has to approve the songs b4 they are actually in the film rite....things are in Ratnam's hands....his decision on where to have the songs.....Shankar can just persuade him to have em in his movie(ofcourse shankar wud have done much more coz of the name he has earned with his last 5 films)
  
  
• From: dinesh (@ 210.186.42.34) on: Sat Apr 5 06:57:55 EST 2003
  
  hey man..al those r rumours...arr is the only md who is able to stick with his principal and plzz...sify.com alwiz gives news on rahman wrongnly...coz i think they hate arr...the only good news they gave it the review on Udhaya audio...COZ IT WAS UNDINIABLE GREAT!!!
  
  
• From: tranknu (@ 64.246.46.52) on: Sun Apr 6 08:12:44 EDT 2003
  
  If its from one source than there is a chance that the stupid tabloid could be rumour. But more than once source, thats something to think about. Only time will tell.
  
  
• From: Vijay (@ 203.200.195.2) on: Mon Apr 7 09:57:53 EDT 2003
  
  This is a *periodic* non-sense & nuisance in newtfmpage.
  
  

---

List all pages of this thread

---

Back to the Forum

Post comments